Washington Post fact-checker Glenn Kessler is getting a hefty serving of pushback after suggesting the newspaper had to ignore the Hunter Biden laptop story because they weren’t given access to the hard drive until mid-2021.

Kessler joined Washington Post national columnist Philip Bump in getting defensive over the Elon Musk Twitter files exposé and offering a defense for their own unwillingness to report on the Biden laptop.

Bump argued that “other outlets” couldn’t match the bombshell story, originally reported by the New York Post, because “they weren’t given access to the laptop data.”

Kessler, who we would like to reiterate has the term ‘fact-checker’ in his title, agreed.

“Not until mid-2021 did a source provide The Washington Post a copy of the hard drive. Then my colleagues went immediately (to) work on it,” he tweeted. “We hired experts to assess the veracity and produced articles based on material that could be verified.”

RELATED: Liberal ‘Journalists’ Use VERY Similar Talking Points to Downplay Hunter Biden Censorship Bombshell

Glenn Kessler’s Excuse For Not Covering Hunter Biden’s Laptop Doesn’t Hold Water

It’s impossible to overstate the absurdity of Glenn Kessler’s excuse for not covering the Hunter Biden laptop story.

First, if major newspapers only reported on items they had direct access to, they’d be out of business rather quickly for a lack of material.

Second, accepting Kessler’s premise means the Washington Post should never have reported on the validity of the laptop at all. But that’s not what happened.

It took the Post 532 days to finally confirm that emails attained from Hunter Biden’s infamous laptop were genuine. And yet, they somehow offered repeated commentary trying to downplay the validity of the story numerous times during those 532 days.

The Washington Post was part of the media blackout on the story, stating the emails were “unverified,” they “have never been authenticated,” and published a news analysis dismissing the New York Post’s reporting as “sketchy.”

They also ran opinion columns calling the Hunter story a “non-scandal” and “fake.”

How could they possibly have reported so definitively without having access to the hard drive?

Third, needing first-hand verification doesn’t seem to have stopped the Washington Post from reporting on other news stories that actually turned out to be ‘fake’ or ‘non-scandals.’

Russia collusion, the Steele dossier – which they made numerous corrections regarding after it was disproved – a story about Rudy Giuliani receiving advance notice from the FBI that he was the target of a Russia influence campaign, the Nicholas Sandmann smear, etc.

Those topics weren’t verified before print because they couldn’t be verified. The Washington Post ran with them anyway.

And fourth, contrary to Kessler’s claim, Human Events senior editor Jack Posobiec made a “standing offer to any member of the MSM” for a copy of the laptop’s hard drive.

“None of them have even tried to accept it,” he claimed.

RELATED: Welcome To The Party, Pal: Washington Post Finally Decides To Confirm Hunter Biden’s Laptop

Skepticism Abounds

Suffice it to say, Twitter followers weren’t necessarily buying what Glenn Kessler was selling regarding the Hunter Biden story.

Several responded offering little more than skepticism over his excuse for the Washington Post not covering the scandal.

Kessler, Bump and the Washington Post are either actively misrepresenting the truth about why they refused to cover the story, or they are incredibly bad at their jobs (equally likely).

Now is the time to support and share the sources you trust.
The Political Insider ranks #3 on Feedspot’s “100 Best Political Blogs and Websites.”





Source link

By unstore

Unstore.com.np : The One-stop Destination! Read the latest global news articles on unstore.com.np in english,breaking news & current latest global news headlines,local news, money and financial news,Bitcoin News,automobile news,gaming news,technology news,sports news,political news,international news,bollywood news,tech news

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.